KSH 522 - Evidence-Based Practices in Women's Health

The aim of this course is to provide the students with the knowledge, skills and methods of evidence-based scientific research in obstetrics and gynecology.

Evidence-based practices, evidence levels, evidence-based application sources, systematic review, evidence-based practice guidelines, evidence-based practices in obstetrics and gynecology

1. Onat Bayram G. (2009). Kanıta Dayalı Uygulamalar Doğrultusunda Alternatif Bir Doğum Yöntemi: Evde Doğum, Maltepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Bilim ve Sanatı Dergisi, 2(3): 99-104.

2. Obstetric Evidence Based Guidelines Vincenzo Edited b y n Maternal Berghella Series I - Med i c i n e F etal Philadelphia, PA USA, 2007 Informa UK Ltd www.informahealthcare.com

3. Clinical protocols in obstetrics and gynecology. Third Edition John E Turrentine University Of Georgia USA 2008 Informa UK Ltd

4. Morris M. Scott-Findlay S. Estabrooks C.A. (2001). Evidence-based Nursing Web Sites: Finding the Best Resources. AACN, 12 (4): 578-587.

5. Brucher MC. (2001). Management of the third stage of labor, an evidence based aproach, Journal of Midwifery and Womens Health, 46(6):381-392.

6. Carr CA, Schott A. (2002). Differences in evidence based care in midwifery care and education, Journal of Nursing Scholarship 34(2).

7. Edgren KS. (2001). Using evidence based practice to improve intrapartum care, JOGNN 34(4):371-375.

8. The Cochrane Library. www.cochrane.org

9. Burns N, Grove S K. (2007). Undersatanding Nursing Research: Building an Evidence-Based Practice. Fourth Edition, Elsevier, St.Louis.

10. Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2009). The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. 6th ed. USA: Saunders.

11. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. (2011). What’s new in Version 5.1.0. Erişim: 25.06.2011. http://www.cochrane.org/sites/default/files/uploads/ handbook/ Whats%20new%20in%20 Handbook%205_1_0.pdf.

12. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2008). Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York, 2008 Published by CRD, Üniversity of York: York Publishing Services Ltd, ISBN 978-1-900640-47-3.

13. Critical Appraisal Skill Programme. (2006). England: Public Health Research Unit. Erişim: 20.07.2011. http://www.sph.nhs.uk/sph-files/casp-appraisal-tools.

14. Gerrish, K., & Lacey, A. (2010). The research process in nursing. 6th ed. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

15. Grimshaw, J., McAuley, L. M., Bero, L. A., Grilli, R., Oxman, A. D., Ramsay, C., et al. (2003). Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes. Quality and Safety in Health Care,12, 298–303

16. Hemingway, P., & Brereton, N. (2009). What is a systematic review? Erişim: 20.07.2011. http://www.whatisseries.co.uk/whatis/

1. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds). (March 2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. Erişim: 30.06.2011. http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/ cochrane/ handbook/

2. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group. (2009). Reprint—preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Physical Therapy, 89(9), 873-880.

3. Moula, P., & Goodman M. (2009). Nursing Research. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.

4. Reitsma, J. B., Rutjes, A. W. S., Whiting, P., Vlassou, V. V., Leeflang, M. M. G., Deeks, J. J. (2009). Assessing methodological quality. In J. J. Deeks, P. M. Bossuyt, C. Gatsonis (Ed.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Version 1.0.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. Erişim: 25.07.2011. http://srdta.cochrane.org./